The government is considering giving extra protections to workers and the environment in order to win support for its Brexit withdrawal agreement.
The proposals have been put forward by Labour Leave supporter John Mann.
Business Secretary Greg Clark said the amendment showed “Parliament coming together” behind the PM’s deal.
But Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will tell activists that a general election is the most democratic way of breaking the Brexit deadlock.
Mr Mann said his amendment, which is backed by a number of other Labour MPs in Leave-supporting constituencies, would open up the opportunity for other improvements to the prime minister’s deal.
Theresa May met some of the group on Wednesday and BBC political correspondent Nick Eardley said the move would be seen “as an attempt to win over some Labour waverers” in the big vote, which is due to take place next Tuesday.
However he said the Labour leadership “is unlikely to be swayed” and the government’s pledge is not believed to be legally binding.
Prominent Brexiteer and Tory backbencher Jacob Rees-Mogg said it was the “right approach” for the government to seek support in this way, but he would still be voting against the government’s “deeply unsatisfactory” deal.
Mr Mann told BBC News the amendment was not about supporting Mrs May, but about establishing Labour’s own “red lines in terms of people’s lives”.
“We do not want to see a Brexit where we become some kind of Singapore economy; where it is a race to the bottom, where we try to undercut everyone else and where workers lose out,” he said. “What we want is to compete by being the best in the world.”
The backbencher said the amendment would make it more likely for him to back the deal, but admitted it didn’t mean other Labour MPs would be “rushing” to do the same when the vote takes place on Tuesday.
Mr Clark told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “To establish what Parliament wants and what Parliament supports can be useful.
“I am sure that there will be some assurances that some colleagues need and some amendments… but that is the process of Parliament coming together and I hope that is what will happen.”
Asked about the amendment on the same programme, Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon said: “I don’t trust the Tories on workers’ rights.”
In a speech in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, Jeremy Corbyn will later reiterate his preference for a general election, saying that only a government with a “renewed mandate” would get public support for a withdrawal deal.
His party will oppose Theresa May’s deal next week, and push for a vote of no confidence if it is rejected by MPs.
Labour MPs in Leave areas who would at least consider the prime minister’s deal have previously expressed astonishment that she hadn’t reached out to them.
No longer. A face-to-face meeting with the prime minister to explore what it would take to win their support is significant – and part of a wider Downing Street strategy to broaden much needed backing for her deal.
But the Labour leadership aren’t impressed with commitments to workers’ and environmental rights which they say wouldn’t be legally enforceable – and unless the prime minister is willing to negotiate a customs union with the EU too they won’t be coming on-side.
Labour activists are also keen to see the deal voted down to allow Jeremy Corbyn to argue for an election – and will keep the pressure on his MPs to do so.
Even if as many as 20 Labour MPs could be won over by No 10, this wouldn’t be enough to neutralise the larger number of Conservative opponents of the deal. So moves to build cross party support are more likely to limit the scale of any defeat and not avert it.
Mrs May, who will host Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for talks at Downing Street on Thursday, is also continuing efforts to win over sceptical Conservative MPs ahead of Tuesday’s vote.
However, Arlene Foster, leader of Northern Ireland’s DUP which has helped the government win votes since June 2017, has warned the PM her deal is “already dead”.
In a sign that the party has not been swayed by the government’s promise to give the Northern Ireland Assembly a veto over any new EU regulations introduced under the terms of the proposed backstop arrangement, she accused Mrs May of “wasting time”.
The government has lost two Brexit votes in two days. The first defeat limits the government’s financial powers in the event of a no-deal departure. The second forces the PM to announce new plans within three days if her deal fails in the Commons.
Senior Conservatives have continued to express opposition to the withdrawal agreement and declaration on future relations, negotiated by Mrs May in November.
On the first of five days of debate on the deal, former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell said: “I’ve been astonished that she would bring back to the Commons a deal she knows she has absolutely no chance whatsoever to get through, and also with apparently no plan B.”
But Business Secretary Mr Clark said it was time Parliament “recognised its collective responsibility” to back the prime minister’s deal and avoid a no deal Brexit.
He said: “We have got a good deal. [It] achieves what is required to avoid what would be a disastrous situation where we move to the most rudimentary terms of trade with our closest trading partners.
“Given that we have got that deal, it is my strong view that we need to come together now, we need act to avoid no deal, because I don’t think there is anything remotely like a majority in Parliament that will tolerate it.”
In a speech on Thursday, Mr Corbyn will say that Mrs May – who abandoned a vote on the deal last month – will forfeit the right to govern if she cannot get her Brexit deal through the Commons.
“A government that cannot get its business through the Commons is no government at all,” he will say.
“To break the deadlock, an election is not only the most practical option, it is also the most democratic option. It would give the winning party a renewed mandate to negotiate a better deal for Britain and secure support for it in Parliament and across the country.”
Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson told ITV’s Peston programme it was “a question of when not if” the party tabled a vote of no confidence in the government, although he suggested the opposition would wait to hear what Mrs May said in response to any defeat before deciding what to do.
The DUP says it will support the government in any confidence vote if the Brexit deal is rejected, making a defeat less likely.
Critics of Mr Corbyn’s leadership say he is reluctant to go down this route because, if he fails, pressure will increase on him to endorse calls by many of his MPs – and what polls suggest is a majority of party members – for another referendum.
Former Conservative minister George Freeman accused Mr Corbyn of facing two ways at once, behaving like “a Brexiteer up north and a Remainer down south”.
Thursday’s Brexit debate will focus on agriculture and employment, with Environment Secretary Michael Gove and Business Secretary Greg Clark leading for the government.
Meanwhile, the Japanese prime minister is expected to use his visit to warn that a disorderly Brexit will be damaging for the 1,000 Japanese firms with operations in the UK, including Toyota and Honda.
Conservative and Labour MPs who voted this week to limit the government’s financial powers in the event of a “no-deal” Brexit have said Parliament is acting responsibly in trying to prevent this scenario. Many of them favour a closer, Norway-style relationship with Europe, or want to hold another referendum.
But Brexiteers have said the developments are meaningless as they do not oblige the government to do anything and the UK will still be leaving on 29 March.
Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the House of Commons, told ITV’s Peston on Wednesday it would be an “absolute betrayal” of the 17.4 million voters who backed Brexit, if the UK did not leave as planned.
Quick guide: What is a no-deal Brexit?
A “no-deal” Brexit is where the UK would cut ties with the European Union overnight without a transition period.
Theresa May’s government, and many others, believe this would be hugely damaging and want a more gradual withdrawal. But if Parliament can’t agree on that, and nothing else takes its place, the UK will leave without a deal.
This would mean the UK would not have to obey EU rules. Instead, it would need to follow World Trade Organization terms on trade. Many businesses would see new taxes on imports, exports and services, which are likely to increase their operating costs. That means the prices of some goods in UK shops could go up.
The UK would also lose the trade agreements it had with other countries as a member of the EU, all of which would need to be renegotiated alongside the new agreement with the EU itself.
Manufacturers in the UK expect to face delays in components coming across the border.
The UK would be free to set its own immigration controls. However some UK professionals working in the EU and UK expats could face uncertainty until their status was clarified. The European Commission has said that even in a no-deal scenario, UK travellers won’t need a visa for short visits of up to 90 days.
The border between Northern Ireland and the Irish republic would become an external frontier for the EU with customs and immigration controls, though how and where any checks would be made is not clear.
Some Leave supporters think that leaving without a deal would be positive if the right preparations were made. They say criticism is scaremongering and any short term pain would be for long term gain.
But critics – including both Brexit supporters and opponents – say that leaving without a deal would be a disaster for the UK: driving up food prices, leading to shortages of goods and gridlock on some roads in the South East resulting from extra border checks.